Order:
  1.  19
    Individual differences in object recognition.Jennifer J. Richler, Andrew J. Tomarken, Mackenzie A. Sunday, Timothy J. Vickery, Kaitlin F. Ryan, R. Jackie Floyd, David Sheinberg, Alan C. -N. Wong & Isabel Gauthier - 2019 - Psychological Review 126 (2):226-251.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  19
    The moderating effects of contamination sensitivity on state affect and information processing: Examination of disgust specificity.Thomas Armstrong, Andrew J. Tomarken & Bunmi O. Olatunji - 2012 - Cognition and Emotion 26 (1):136-143.
  3.  11
    What is the critical evidence favoring expectancy bias theory, and where is it?Andrew J. Tomarken - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (2):313-314.
    Davey has failed to clarify the critical evidence that could corroborate the expectancy bias hypothesis and refute preparedness theory. Such a clarification is necessary because each theory could potentially allow for multiple distal and proximal influences on selective associations. Expectancies are not the only proximal mediators. Our recent findings indicate that affective response matching may be an additional factor promoting such associations.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation